Sleep IoT Quest - Day 14 Progress Update
Day Summary
Alright, foreword time. Well, I fucked up.
I have the Timely Start protocol: wake up → 30 minutes to boot up — grab a coffee, take a shower, plop your ass down in front of the laptop — and go. Thirty minutes after getting out of bed, you start.
Why does that exist? Because my lazy ass will want to postpone in favor of something fun. That becomes a problem a few weeks into a project. That’s when you start craving quick resolutions and quick rewards. That’s when you start switching or taking shortcuts.
Toward the end of the day, energy is low, so if I postpone my Daily Quest (right now: reading the Rust book) until evening, I get subpar processing and probably don’t even complete the full 90 minutes. That’s not good for progress.
Today I fucked up: I got excited about my impending move to the new apartment and wasted the morning hours as far as the project goes. It came back to bite me. I can lug boxes in the evening; I cannot concentrate on a highly technical book in the evening very well. The more you know.
The good thing: my framework treats slip-ups as feedback, not failure. It’s a reminder — I don’t do well if I skip the morning session. Don’t postpone. Do it in the morning, and it works. It works meticulously well.
- Daily Quest: yes, but not full 90m (started late; evening session only).
- Reading (50m, +5 pages): low processing; more eye-scanning letters than "reading" (eg processing sentences).
- Coding: none today.
- Protocols: Timely Start = missed (started in the evening).
Context
- Began late; only 50 minutes left in the day.
- Energy/focus was low; the session turned into page-turning without much uptake.
Reading
- 50 minutes, +5 pages.
- Mental state drifted toward “can I skip this?” / “what’s the minimum to take away?” — a classic avoidance loop when energy is low.
Coding Practice
- None (reading-only day).
Reflection
- Timely Start + Daily Quest exist for a reason. Without the morning burst, end-of-day execution is low-yield.
- Trying to skip chapters or hunt for shortcuts can “work” short-term, but it pushes the cost forward: you’ll either re-read later or make avoidable design mistakes from missing concepts.
- Tonight was a reminder that late sessions = low processing.
Key Learning
- Don’t trade the morning window for evening scraps.
- Skipping is a debt: you’ll repay it in rework or confusion later.
- When the brain seeks an “easy way out,” that’s a cue to return to the protocol, not to prune the material.
Total Time Spent
- Reading: 50m
- Coding: 0m
- Daily total: 50m
PCT (Project Cumulative Time): 19h59m